Plurk You!
So, I've been following the rabbit hole of online social networking (which they should just shorten to OSN already) for a while now. It took me awhile to get on board with twitter but once I did, I loved the potential. When twitter started having the "fail whale" appear lots of people began to look for a new playground.
That's when I started to hear about Plurk.
Potential:
I'm still trying out its potential for business owners. It is far more lucrative than twitter, but the ability to have conversations in real time is an awesome power. I'm hearing a lot about Plurk "replacing" Twitter but I have to disagree. Twitter allows you to search for people in your industry and follow them through microblogging. Plurk lets you start conversations, meet other people in your friend's network through mutual interests as well as answer the eternal question: what are you doing?
What Plurk is like:
Plurk is not a linear format like Twitter which threw me off at first. Instead it is more of a web type design. You can click on plurks you want to read and then reply. Other people can reply too, so you can have a huge meeting of mind in a 5 minute span of time just to answer one question. While on Twitter you can have an instant response, watching it all be threaded in one box is pretty exhilarating.
I will admit, my first day on Plurk, I wasn't impressed. The colors bothered me, the timeline confused me and I thought the random plurk creatures were creepy.
[Caption] Is that a headless dog? Who designed this?
Plurk vs. Twitter:
But, like any new experience, it took me a few hours to get used it and soon I felt compulsively drawn to Plurk. The great thing about instant interaction is that after a few days with Plurk I felt like I knew my friends better than with 3 weeks of twitter. Both will have their ups and downs, but both can be important tools.
Personally, I hope someone makes a site or application that combines them. They should call it pitter because it sounds like raindrops and that is the essence of both these sites: the little droplets of conversation and thought that make up a storm.
Contagious Media:
I saw someone comment on Plurk that the willingness of so many twitters to try this new site was interesting. I think so too. It took me months to give in and sign up for twitter but only a day or to to try Plurk.
This, I believe, is a trend that we are seeing and will continue to see, in regard to new interactive mediums. MySpace took a while to catch on, Facebook, much less. Perhaps this is an offshoot of
These are just my thoughts. Let me know what you think about the acceptance of new technology. Am I just becoming an early adopter or is this a trend? Will Plurk and Twitter go head-to-head? I'm sure there will be more on this as I continue to discover and learn.
Tags: Trends






June 3rd, 2008 at 2:18 pm
I think Plurk should do well if the word can get out. The fan base is already rabid. I know I’m rabid, I’ve spent a total of 12 hours on the service in 2 days!
June 3rd, 2008 at 2:23 pm
how’s this for a comment?
June 3rd, 2008 at 2:37 pm
Well you asked if we could comment. I haven’t read the whole post yet, but I will continue reading it. I made a long blog post yesterday as well, in two languages.
June 3rd, 2008 at 2:48 pm
Thanks for commenting guys. Rosie you should post a link and I will make sure to check it out.
June 3rd, 2008 at 2:57 pm
Here? Well just click my name and you’ll end up on my blog (the latest post is about Plurk
)
June 3rd, 2008 at 4:10 pm
Interesting post.
While I like the animated, time-flow pluckiness of Plurk, I find Twitter more engaging, (for now anyway). With Plurk, it seems you have to actively participate to get the most out of it. It’s a real-time interaction mixer, with the conversations moving before your eyes. There’s pressure to keep up.
With Twitter, I can come and go, and I don’t feel as left out if I haven’t checked in lately. I like how the ambient intimacy (http://www.disambiguity.com/ambient-intimacy/ ) found on Twitter is hard to beat.
June 4th, 2008 at 7:30 am
I like Twitter, but I like Plurk better (at least for the time being).
Though to be fair, they are two completely different beasts in purpose.
Twitter’s original function was as a microblog only. I don’t think the people at Twitter realized their own potential, and thus the Fail Whale was born.
Plurk was created to create the social interaction options people wish Twitter had. And it’s groovy.
The one thing I am worried about… I have a (currently) running fiction piece on Twitter (http://www.twitter.com/junkdnafiction) , I can’t just up and move. Moreover, I’m not so certain that Plurk has the right interface for my fiction. I think the side medical-graph flow would be confusing to readers. However, I have yet to try it. Who knows.
By the way, I can’t read the god damn Captcha below. I don’t really believe there is a code there, I think it’s all a ruse.
June 8th, 2008 at 4:17 pm
Plurk me?!? How about you go Plurk yourself.
June 27th, 2008 at 3:52 pm
[...] people, so a lot of users “began to look for a new playground” (yes, I stole that last quote from Veribatim). On one of the few chances I had to check the public timeline of Twitter, I found a link to some [...]
June 27th, 2008 at 4:13 pm
Plurk me! You are already a Plurk friend. Check out my Plurk post: